I’ve always found Raymond Chandler’s writing to be inspirational, sublime, and maddening. I have no idea how many times I’ve read Farewell, My Lovely, and there’s still a lot about it I just don’t get. The work is an adventure tale, a work of art, and a puzzle. Chandler broke a lot of rules. But I, and countless other fans, keep coming back.
This retrospective on Chandler’s unique approach in Literary Hub echoes my feelings toward this gifted and driven artist:
Looking at Chandler’s work in retrospect, it seems fair to say that he wasn’t really a “mystery writer”—or not first and foremost. Plots didn’t interest him much. They were just pegs on which to hang characters and language. His plots were not particularly original but that never bothered him. “Very likely Agatha Christie and Rex Stout write better mysteries. But their words don’t get up and walk. Mine do.” And: “I don’t care whether the mystery is fairly obvious but I do care about the people, about this strange, corrupt world we live in and how any man who tries to be honest looks in the end either sentimental or just plain foolish.”
Story construction and the tying up of loose ends never bothered him. When director Howard Hawks was filming The Big Sleep, he cabled Chandler: “Who killed the chauffeur?” Chandler cabled back: “No idea.”
When he himself collaborated with the young Billy Wilder on what was Chandler’s first Hollywood film, Double Indemnity, Wilder observed that “Chandler was a dilettante. He did not like the structure of a screenplay… He was a mess but he could write a beautiful sentence. ‘There is nothing as empty as an empty swimming pool.’ That is a great line.” He would later give his moody one-time partner credit for being “one of the greatest creative minds I’ve ever encountered.”
I think Chandler’s face reflects the purposeful rebellion and probing intelligence one senses behind the writer’s challenging and endlessly intriguing fiction.
No one managed to break the rules and pull it off quite so brilliantly as him.
LikeLike
PorterGIrl,
Agreed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like to believe Carver made the rules and didn’t break them. 🙂
LikeLike
aestueve,
I’m sure he would’ve agreed with you!
LikeLike
The “who done it”has its place in mystery and suspense. As a reader, I seemed to gravitate to the “How they catch the bad guy” stories. As I developed my own fiction, I found the tales unfolding to be the latter. It’s what I know best. In my “real life” cases the “How to catch..” far outnumbered the “Who done it”. And the characters, both the good and the very bad, are just too much fun to create. Someday I may attempt the twisty turny baffler but there are so many of the others to tell first.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So many plot ideas, so little time…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Raymond Chandler. What an interesting approach to writing.
LikeLike
“Interesting” indeed. Chandler knew what he wanted to do, and did it.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Notes from An Alien and commented:
It’s been good to see more and more people admitting that many of the “Rules” of writing are Bunk…
Today’s re-blog shares some important Insights…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Alexander!
LikeLike
Ah, Chandler! The Big Sleep and The Long Goodbye remain favorites, even after many years and countless books have passed through my life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
robert okaji,
Yes. Some books you can read once, enjoy, and move on. Others keep pulling you back.
And they never get old!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on quirkywritingcorner.
LikeLike
I’ve yet to read a book of his but it’s on the to do list. Any recommendation for what I could start with?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Start with a freebie:
http://ae-lib.org.ua/texts-c/chandler__red_wind__en.htm
Farewell My Lovely is a great place to start. It’s both puzzling and addictive.
LikeLike
Wow. I would like to follow RAYMOND CHANDLER’S writings.
LikeLike